So Sikhs should not feel better that he did any better job in interpreting Jap ji, it can be systematically torn apart by taking support from Guru Nanak’s ideology alone. He was a real master of words, many did fall for that art however, mind fixed on logic and its application as he did, would not get influenced by him in any way.
I listened to his tapes, read his books and also especially went through his interpretation of Japji, couldn’t find it impressive in any way, I mean not even the vast knowledge he displayed in his other discourses or books, it lacked it here. Just one example, about Guru Nanak, whose mind was embracing Lord as infinite, who leads the soul to move on higher through realm of knowledge, Osho wrote” when Nanak died, he thought about his birth place( as he witnessed that) and imagined flowers were blooming…’ Osho could have done so, not Guru Nanak, there is no place in Jap ji about such whims of mind.
Osho talked on hear say, never stuck to the idea Guru tries to pass on. If you read his interpretation of Jap ji, you would never go into the depth Guru Nanak takes you if he is understood. After having said that, I must say, he had no originality to pass on, just like a Math teacher, who can teach but cannot introduce new principles to solve problems. Osho was very learned person and he grasped pretty much well what he studied, he could recall from his memory any reference he wanted to. rest is all upto ur knowledgability if u could understand silence of God. criticising will bring ur moral down in spirituality bcoz God never ever did any thing wrong till date. Do u people agree that we ourself are eligible for talking like this for any one like osho or some one else or even me or urself, why we are talking non sense for nothing just forget the word criticise and learn the word meditation, start doing it u ll find hidden quotes by God that ll make ur mouth shut and u ll stop criticising any thing for ever. Gurus themselves did enter bani of different saints into Guru Granth Sahib symbolises that only the word in the praise of God will be considered nothing else,then why this kind of personalised question like he was eligible for describing Jap ji sahib. by talking on this kind of issue we are again into personalisation process as it was 500 years back. dont say who did it just read it and how well he explained it that should be the point of consideration. we are all bound imperfectionist bcoz no body is complete and who will make normal humans to understand guru,s bani like japji sahib. Had any one created any thing or write any thing that should explain Gurbani and osho rajneesh did that in Japji Sahib,s translation in front of giani zail singh.
0 kommentar(er)
